Bienvenidos a CafeBoricua!

Bienvenidos a CafeBoricua.com,  Un foro donde se discute la Politica Boricua aparte de otros temas de actualidad e interes.  Aqui existe la mayor libertad de expresion donde pueden debatir libremente.  Registrate!

 
Como la mayoria de las comunidades en linea necesita registrarse para poder postear en nuestra comunidad, pero no se preocupe esto es un proceso simple que solo requiere minima informacion. Sea parte de Cafe Boricua creando una cuenta con nosotros.  Puede logearse con su cuenta de Facebook o Twitter.

  • Comienze nuevos temas y responda a otros
  • Subscribirse a temas y foros y recibir actualizaciones automaticas.
  • Crea su propio perfil y haga nuevas amistades.
  • Comparta sus posteos o temas en las redes sociales.
  • Personalize su experiencia aqui.
  • Crea una encuesta!   Una gallery de fotos.  Anuncie un evento. 

Animate a participar en nuestro foro boricua!


Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mimapr

Michele Bachmann: No Porno Ni Matrimonios Gay

149 posts in this topic

[quote name='napoleon888' timestamp='1310489953' post='2933709']
Jajajaja parece que las turbas republikkkanas estan botando espuma por la boca...

jajajajajajajajajajajajajaja

Que brutt!!! Que brutt!!!
[/quote]

Asi es y si no se mantienen en el tema , los seguire censurando, .. No jodas....los pajarons tirandole a las escopetas!!

Pero regresando al tema, en estos dias grabaron a uno tipo de la clinica de Bachmann ofreciendo ayuda a un gay para que deje de serlo....esta gente lo que hacen es robando dinero federal ....y luego se atreven criticar a Parenthood cuando ellos hacen lo mismo o peor....hipocritas!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Siguen saliendo noticias sobre el marido de closet de santa Michele...... :whistle: Por cierto tan religiosa y tan mentirosa!!! HIPOCRITAS!!

[b][size="3"][color="#000080"]Marcus Bachmann’s Big Gay Mess[/color][/size][/b]

Richard Lawson —As his congresswoman wife Michele continues to make progress in her terrifying death march toward Washington, Marcus Bachmann has become a focus of the ever-curious media, and the things we've found out about him have been a bit unsettling, like the fact that he runs one of those pray-the-gay-away facilities.

Last week a group called Truth Wins Out, which is dedicated to combating the useless and damaging practice called reparative therapy, revealed that they'd sent someone undercover to seek out counseling for unwanted homosexuality at Bachmann & Associates, the Minnesota counseling centers that comprise the family's "small business" that Michele is often eager to mention in speeches. [color="#FF0000"]What that operative discovered was that counselors at Bachmann & Associates are actively practicing Christian ex-gay therapy tactics:[/color]

When I mentioned that I can objectively acknowledge a woman's beauty without having any sexual feelings toward her whatsoever, I was told that whenever I saw an attractive woman I just needed to reinforce in my mind that she was, indeed, attractive, and that God made her this way and made me to notice her. After all, "God designed our eyes to be attracted to the woman's body, to be attracted to everything, to be attracted to her breasts." Further, according to Wiertzema, "We're all heterosexuals, but we have different challenges." Attraction to the same sex "is there, and it's real, but at the core value, in terms of how God created us, we're all heterosexual."

[color="#FF0000"] Last night ABC News ran a report on Bachmann & Associates and reparative therapy, which has been determined both ineffective and potentially harmful by the American Psychological Association, among other groups[/color].

While the counselor featured in this particular story isn't Bachmann himself, and Bachmann has previously denied that his business traffics in homosexual cures, a belief in effective ex-gay therapy would be in line with comments he made on a talk radio show last year, in which he likened gays and lesbians to "barbarians" in need of deliverance.

Think Progress dug that clip up last month and it's been making the rounds for a few weeks now. So Marcus Bachmann, potential First Gentleman of America, really doesn't like gay people. Oh, and he might be a fake psychologist.

[b][color="#FF0000"]Yes, there's been some digging around in Bachmann's academic history and what's been found seems to suggest that Bachmann's PhD, if he even has one, is not in psychology:[/color][/b]

[b]What does all this mean? On his website Dr. Bachmann states he's had 23 years experience. Simple math brings us to the year 1988. If Dr. Bachmann's Ph.D. was completed prior to this date, he might have graduated from The Union Graduate School which offered ONLY a Ph.D. in Arts and Sciences. If he graduated later than 1986, then he would have graduated from The Union Institute (1986), or The Union Institute and University (2001) and his Ph.D. would have been in Interdisciplinary Studies.[/b]

If in fact Dr. Marcus Bachmann graduated from this institute, whatever it was named at the time, he would not have graduated with a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology. The ONLY doctorate in Clinical Psychology was offered after 2001, and the degree is a Psy.D. (Doctor of Psychology) and not a Ph.D. (Doctor of Philosophy).

In my opinion, I highly doubt that Dr. Marcus Bachmann is even a licensed Psychologist. However, at this point in time, I was unable to confirm my suspicion, as web access to the Psychology Board of Minnesota site, which is part of the State of Minnesota website has been suspended for the duration of the state government shutdown.
[b][color="#FF0000"]
And, in fact, he's not even licensed to practice psychology in the state of Minnesota.[/color][/b] (That's technically OK, though, as Minnesota doesn't require a license to practice psychology, but still.) So the small business that Michele Bachmann is always mentioning in an effort to assert that she's just another American like you is a sinister religious reorientation center run by an unlicensed closet case. Great.

Oh, yeah, and about that last part? [b][size="4"][color="#FF0000"]Lots of people have been making the assumption that because he's a little bit that way, Bachmann—like so many other anti-gay weirdos—is in fact a sadly closeted gay man himself.[/color][/size][/b] Who knows either way, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was! I mean, conducting therapy that's largely about listening to gay dudes talk about their naughty, naughty sex urges is a pretty gay job to have.

So that's Marcus Bachmann right now! And he could soon be performing all the duties of the president's spouse, from giving tours of the White House to, y'know, introducing major legislation. 2013 could be really weird guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Humm, should I discount the year I spent in Undergraduate Pilot Training from my flying experience? I too say I have 23 years of professional experience, but I spent that first year, May of 1988 to May of 1989, in school learning to be a pilot. I cannot count that year?


Could it be that Dr. Bachmann's 23 years of experience include related work BEFORE he attained his PhD? Most PhD candidates do clinical and other related work before and during their training, and all that count as experience.


[b]You guys are definitely scared of Michelle Bachmann.[/b] The paralyzing phobia you had for Sarah Palin is slowly transfering to Bachmann, and for that alone I would put her in the 2012 Republican ticket. And again, for you EXPERIENCE was obviously unimportant for electing the president in 2008. Edited by Artaguito

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Bendito, si nos traes una "noticia" de un blog (Gawker) que se autodescribe como que se especializa en chismes de los celebrities de NY... De hecho, no es mas que una sopa de inuendos y medias verdades como:
[b][color="#FF0000"]And, in fact, he's not even licensed to practice psychology in the state of Minnesota. ([u]That's technically OK, though, as Minnesota doesn't require a license to practice psychology,[/u] but still.)[/color][/b]
O se es o no se es? Ja, ja, ja...

O sea que la Bachman ya es una celebridad... segun un blog de chismes niuyorquino...

Te felicito!!! No decepcionas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSAHJ_7_pS8[/YouTube]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Siempre he pensado que parte del odio es que las candidatas republicanas siempre son mas lindas que las candidatas democratas. Puede ser los an~os que las democratas han pasado agriadas y enfurecidas con los hombres y eso tarde o temprano se les refleja en la cara.

Compara Nikki Haley, Michelle Bachmann, y Sarah Palin a Hillary, Nancy Pelosi y a Debbie Wasserman-Shultz. No falla.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='Artaguito' timestamp='1310514677' post='2933757']
Siempre he pensado que parte del odio es que las candidatas republicanas siempre son mas lindas que las candidatas democratas. Puede ser los an~os que las democratas han pasado agriadas y enfurecidas con los hombres y eso tarde o temprano se les refleja en la cara.

Compara Nikki Haley, Michelle Bachmann, y Sarah Palin a Hillary, Nancy Pelosi y a Debbie Wasserman-Shultz. No falla.
[/quote]

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh es que ustedes votan por lindas aunque sean brutas!! Y por los hombres brutos pero que sean machos....con razon los ultimos presidentes republicanos han sido un fracaso........es que su electorado tiene cerebro de mime.... :retarded:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='mimapr' timestamp='1310511462' post='2933756']
[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSAHJ_7_pS8[/YouTube]
[/quote]

Because Bill "I party with Heff" Maher is such a political savant... He's a comedian and far from being a centrist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='mimapr' timestamp='1310515127' post='2933760']
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh es que ustedes votan por lindas aunque sean brutas!! Y por los hombres brutos pero que sean machos....con razon los ultimos presidentes republicanos han sido un fracaso........es que su electorado tiene cerebro de mime.... :retarded:
[/quote]


Quizas se deba a que la izquietda solo atrae a mujeres poco atractivas... Las que no necesitan actitudes de igualdad maniquea tienden a ser capitalistas y republicanas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Vuelvo y repito, los hombres con cerebro de mime solo miran el fisico, por eso el partido esta lleno de brutas!!!!! Algunos las prefieren modelitos aunque les peguen cuernos!!! :hysterical: Pero el tema no es lindura , es lo que posicion de Michele Bachmann sobre los gays, el porno y los cuernos!!!!! :hysterical:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Me vas a negar Que de la vista nace el amor?Esta probado que la gente stractivatiene mas exito u oportunidades que los que no Lo son.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Vuelvo y repito este no es el tema aqui....tan dificil te es seguir en el tema? Tengo muchismas contestaciones para tus preguntas estupidas, pero no te voy a seguir el juego....la proxima te comienzo a editar o borrar si estas fuera del tema. El tema es Michele Bachman!! y su posicion referente a los gays, el porno y los cuernos......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
El tema en verdad es la ridicula transformacion liberal del SarahPhobia al MichellePhobia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Quien es mas lindo, Fortuno o Alejandrito? :hysterical:

Para complacer a algunos aqui hay que buscar para la presidencia a uno que sea G L B o T. Ah, y que no hable de religion ni de moral! Ok? Arriba la nueva sociedad y el "New World" ! : :doh: Edited by Magie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='mimapr' timestamp='1310521974' post='2933772']
Vuelvo y repito este no es el tema aqui....tan dificil te es seguir en el tema? Tengo muchismas contestaciones para tus preguntas estupidas, pero no te voy a seguir el juego....la proxima te comienzo a editar o borrar si estas fuera del tema. El tema es Michele Bachman!! y su posicion referente a los gays, el porno y los cuernos......
[/quote]

[color="#FF0000"]
jEDITADO[/color]
[color="#FF0000"]ESTE TAMPOCO ES EL TEMA.[/color]

[quote name='Magie' timestamp='1310526215' post='2933781']
Quien es mas lindo, Fortuno o Alejandrito?

Para complacer a algunos aqui hay que buscar para la presidencia a uno que sea G L B o T. Ah, y que no hable de religion ni de moral! Ok? Arriba la nueva sociedad y el "New World" ! :
[/quote]


Ese no es el tema aqui :rulez: :banned: Edited by mimapr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='Artaguito' timestamp='1310525035' post='2933778']
El tema en verdad es la ridicula transformacion liberal del SarahPhobia al MichellePhobia.
[/quote]


Mas ridiculo eres tu con tu Obama Phobia....... :retarded:


Regresando al tema....ya que algunos al no tener nada que decir me atacan a mi , a la persona que escribe el articulo o a la persona que critica a la Michele pero no hablan sobre ella y el tema......tan colleras son que no pueden opinar sobre el tema?????? La unica respuesta a esto es fanatismo o compraron su titulo como el marido de la Michele.....republicanos = tramposos.....lo estan demostrando.... :whistle:


[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhyjWBjDnhE[/YouTube]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Siempre lo he dicho el mejor candidato que ustedes tienen es Romney pero tanto idiota metido en la carrera republicano pone en dudas a TODOS!! Claro Romney dio en el clavo, este documento es "indigno" pero los inteligentes del foro como no tienen cerebro se ha dedicado a tratar de cambiar el tema a envidia, lindura y cuanda idiotez le sale del cerebro vacio......Pero el tema es los gays, porno y los CUERNOS!!! Sera que los repuiblicanos del foro no quieren opinar porque o estan en el closet, o se pasan viendo porno o les pegan los cuernos,....... :hysterical:

[b][size="4"][color="#000080"]Romney refuses to sign anti-gay marriage pledge [/color][/size][/b]

Bachmann, Santorum have adopted Christian group's controversial 14-point document


By THOMAS BEAUMONT



DES MOINES, Iowa — [b][color="#FF0000"]Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's campaign said Tuesday that he will not sign a conservative Iowa Christian group's far-reaching pledge opposing gay marriage, making him the first Republican presidential candidate to reject it. [/color][/b]

.
Two of Romney's rivals for the Republican nomination, [color="#FF0000"]Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, have signed the The Family Leader's 14-point pledge, which calls on the candidates to denounce same-sex marriage rights, pornography, same-sex military accommodations and forms of Islamic law.[/color]

When it was first circulated last week, the introduction to the pledge stated that African American children were more likely to be raised in two-parent households when they were born into slavery than they are today.

The group struck that language and apologized after black ministers complained, but it said it stands by the rest of the document.

[b][size="5"][color="#000080"]'Undignified' [/color][/size][/b]

Andrea Saul, a spokeswoman for Romney, told The Associated Press in a written statement Tuesday that[b][color="#FF0000"] Romney "strongly supports traditional marriage," but that the oath "contained references and provisions that were undignified and inappropriate for a presidential campaign."[/color][/b]

Bachmann and Santorum have been campaigning hard to court the influential social conservatives in Iowa, which holds the nation's first caucuses.
Video: Romney raises money abroad (on this page)

Romney's rejection of the pledge reflects his diminished focus on winning Iowa, where he spent $10 million during his 2008 presidential campaign only to finish second.

.
None of the other GOP presidential hopefuls, including former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich, have said whether they will sign the pledge or not.

Romney, who supported rights for gay couples in Massachusetts, was criticized in Iowa by some Iowa social conservatives during his 2008 campaign, when he finished second in the caucuses after aggressively courting Christian conservatives.

In his second bid, Romney, who leads in national GOP polls, has cast himself as a national figure more focused on the economy, and has said he would not spend as much time and money campaigning in Iowa as he did during his $10 million effort for the 2008 caucuses.

[b]'Not backing away' [/b]

[color="#FF0000"]The Family Leader, an organization formed last year and positioning itself to be an influential player in the 2012 caucuses, said Tuesday they stand by the 14 policy positions listed under the promise to "defend and to uphold the institution of marriage as only between one man and one woman."[/color]

[b][color="#FF0000"]The points include the promise to be faithful to their spouses, enforce the federal Defense of Marriage Act and support a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.[/color][/b]

The group said signing the oath is a condition of winning its endorsement before the caucuses.

"We are standing firm that the 14 points of the marriage vow are right on target and we are creating higher standards for the presidential candidates," said Julie Summa, director of marketing and public outreach for The Family Leader.

"We are not backing away from that at all," she added.

Gay marriage has been a volatile issue in Iowa in recent years, and came to a head in 2009 when the Iowa Supreme Court struck down the state's statutory ban on gay marriage, making same-sex marriages legal.

Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman is not campaigning in Iowa, citing his past opposition to farm subsidies, although he also supported rights for same-sex couples as governor of Utah.

Huntsman campaign aides said Tuesday the former U.S. ambassador to China is declining to sign any pledges as part of his campaign.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
So pena de sonar como el detective de la tele: "Columbo", me tienes algo confundido con lo que es el tema... Esto es lo que he logrado discernir sobre lo que es el tema segun la originadora, moderadora y propietaria:

09 July 2011 - 07:12 AM Firma compromiso con grupo religioso pero que le importa a ella y a esta gente fanatica lo que la gente vea en su hogar y que hagan con su vida???? [b]Estos republicanos hipocritas se quieren meter en las casas y en las camas del pueblo[/b]!!!

11 July 2011 - 12:35 PM: pero nada r[b]egresando al tema de la Michelle idiota Bachmann, ya comenzaron a tirarle los mismos de ella[/b]....

7/12//2011 - 12:44 PM: Pero [b]regresando al tema, en estos dias grabaron a uno tipo de la clinica de Bachmann ofreciendo ayuda a un gay para que deje de serlo[/b]....esta gente lo que hacen es robando dinero federal ....y luego se atreven criticar a Parenthood cuando ellos hacen lo mismo o peor....hipocritas!!

7/12//2011 - 08:52 PM: [b]El tema es Michele Bachman!! y su posicion referente a los gays, el porno y los cuernos[/b]......

7/13/2011: Pero [b]el tema es los gays, porno y los CUERNOS[/b]!!! Sera que los repuiblicanos del foro no quieren opinar porque o estan en el closet, o se pasan viendo porno o les pegan los cuernos


Bueno, cada cual habla de lo que sabe... La Bachman no es el marido. Los clientes del marido van solicitando "ser curados", pues que yo sepa a nadie en esta economia se le obliga a comprar producto alguno sin orden judicial. Si el marido de la Bachman es un marica de closet, que importa si la tipa tiene un romance platonico con el, o implicas que la que es una "butch" de closet es ella y que por eso sus opiniones son "hipocritas"... Si tu marido fuese "gay", no estarias tu en contra de esa predileccion? En cuanto al "porno", mientras no se lo provean a los menores de edad, ni se usen animales o menores de edad o actos contra-natura yo no tengo nada en contra de ello. En cuanto a "cuernos", a la mayoria de los adultos se los han pegado de una mayor o menor severidad. Fuera de una pequena minoria, solo los que no se han dado cuenta piensan que jamas les han pegado uno que otro tarro.

Ahora, si vamos a hablar de estilos de expresarse que utilizan vocabulario agresivo, hostil y cimentado en la certeza de la impunidad, creo que se aplica el "Res-ipsa-loquitor" que vemos no solo en los medios informativos cuando se manejan los potenciales escandalos de el lider de ebano en comparacion de los de los demas politicos adversariales a el. Podemos ver como sofocaron los rumores de su querida, sus muy rumoradas visitas a un club "gay" en Chicago con Rahm; los alegatos de un individuo que alegaba haber tenido un lance con el actual presidente cuando no era un politico importante... Todo eso recibio un trato opaco, sin embargo a figuras como la Bachman, queen mi estimacion puden hacer la competencia interesante, pero no son finalistas. los pasan por la piedra con inuendos como el alegato de que su marido no tiene licencia para practicar psicologia en Minnesota, pero eso no es la gran cosa porque el estado no requiere colegiacion...

Que les pasa; no encuentran municiones para sus ataques en el acopio politico de la Bachman y se lanzan en safari a ver a quien pueden enlazar con ella? Eso seria como tratar de decir que la Hillary es una degenerada porque Bill se echo al plato a cuanta mujer poco atractiva se le atraveso.

Si no te gusta la ideologia de la Bachman, eso lo entiendo, pero por una comisura hablan de mantener decoro en la politica y por la otra desbarran tan mal o peor de lo que critican. Si vamos a hablar de hipocresia tendriamos que empezar con los medios informativos que se vendieron a la gest de Obama por el simple hecho de ser parte de "ese momento historico" en que eligieron a un hombre de color por ser tan solo un hombre de color. El traoto que se le ha dado a este politicucho de distrito hace parecer a mohandas Ghandi como un timador de barrio. Ya veremos como se ve el Barry en una decada o dos. Te garantizo que no sera tan lindo como lo han visto, pues inclusive hoy dia muchos de la claque progresiva se han arrepentido de apoyar a un politico de la perversion de Chicago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Pero mijito no estamos hablando de Obama....hablamos de Michelle Bachman y su marido.....tu y Artaguito tienen una jodia obsecion con Obama que abren como mil temas con lo mismo.....aun les duele la derrota....no me puedo imaginar que pasara cuando vuelva a ganar en el 2012.........Si quieren hablar de Obama tu y Artaguito pues expresen en los temas bobos que abren de lo mismo y mismo.....sera ObamaPhobia o miedo????? :hysterical:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='mimapr' timestamp='1310562363' post='2933792']
Pero mijito no estamos hablando de Obama....hablamos de Michelle Bachman y su marido.....tu y Artaguito tienen una jodia obsecion con Obama que abren como mil temas con lo mismo.....aun les duele la derrota....no me puedo imaginar que pasara cuando vuelva a ganar en el 2012.........Si quieren hablar de Obama tu y Artaguito pues expresen en los temas bobos que abren de lo mismo y mismo.....sera ObamaPhobia o miedo????? :hysterical:
[/quote]

Well, I discussed Bachman and the allegations raised and how they are not about her. I also contrasted that with the overly gentle treatment given another politician whose shenanigans were given given the most survive of short shrifts by a doting and fawning press.

About your allegations:
Obama barely beat McCain. A very weak candidate. Not even the Ob white house thinks that reelection is a done deal. Thst is so much in doubt that the character assassination squads are working feverishly to dig up anything they can finagle into a liability. Actually, we're elated to know that Obama will have to run on his record instead of the "Dreams of our fathers".... After four years, he can't pass blame for the worsening situation. By the way, I've started a somewhat similar thread in the censor-free so that posters can weigh in unencumbered by intolerance. Edited by charlie319

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0