Bienvenidos a CafeBoricua!

Bienvenidos a CafeBoricua.com,  Un foro donde se discute la Politica Boricua aparte de otros temas de actualidad e interes.  Aqui existe la mayor libertad de expresion donde pueden debatir libremente.  Registrate!

 
Como la mayoria de las comunidades en linea necesita registrarse para poder postear en nuestra comunidad, pero no se preocupe esto es un proceso simple que solo requiere minima informacion. Sea parte de Cafe Boricua creando una cuenta con nosotros.  Puede logearse con su cuenta de Facebook o Twitter.

  • Comienze nuevos temas y responda a otros
  • Subscribirse a temas y foros y recibir actualizaciones automaticas.
  • Crea su propio perfil y haga nuevas amistades.
  • Comparta sus posteos o temas en las redes sociales.
  • Personalize su experiencia aqui.
  • Crea una encuesta!   Una gallery de fotos.  Anuncie un evento. 

Animate a participar en nuestro foro boricua!


Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
napoleon888

Cae Ruperto Goebbels Murdoch

79 posts in this topic

[color="#FF0000"]EDITADO[/color] Edited by mimapr
NADA QUE VER CON EL TEMA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Este individuo Rupert tiene [color="#FF0000"]53 MIL EMPLEADOS[/color] y es casi seguro que el tipo no supiera TODO lo que hacen sus empleados [b]CON TAL DE ,MANTENER SUS EMPLEOS[/b] ......Hasta el momento no hay indicios de que esa pactica de ese solo periodico en GB se estuviese haciendo en USA o que este vinculado a algun partido politico dentro de USA!!!.....Que mas se puede decir??? Edited by mimapr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Yo decido donde se quedan las noticias, cuando ustedes sean duenos entonces deciden ustedes.... :eatdrink:


Aqui el ataque a Murdoch hoy en el parlamento.

[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSFV3N7EJUk[/YouTube]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Oiga Jefa:

Ese parlamento no esta en Londres????? De que manera este problema britanico compagina con la politica estadounidense?

Yo se que este chinchorro en decadencia se administra bajo el modelo administrativo "Pinochet" :kissass: ... Por eso es que tiene taaaantos foristas.

BTW, cuando yo critico a la administracion, no me importa si el resto del mundo no ve mi escrito censurado. Tu sabes y yo se que esto esta mal hecho, pero como tu odias a Fox y/o todo lo que no sea de izquierda, dejas que esto este aqui. Usted se esta manejando aqui con una parcialidad que le criticaria a otro... Pero eso no es nada nuevo...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[color="#FF0000"]EDITADO[/color] Edited by mimapr
NADA QUE VER CON EL TEMA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Cuidau que no les caiga la espuma que botan por la boca las turbas republikkkanas...jajajajajajajajaajaja. Aqui le tengo una lista parcial de lo que pierde la claque de aberrados una vez les tumben en mother ship que controla todos sus pensamientos tambien conocido como Faux News:

Panic Mongering. This goes one step beyond simple fear mongering. With panic mongering, there is never a break from the fear. The idea is to terrify and terrorize the audience during every waking moment. From Muslims to swine flu to recession to homosexuals to immigrants to the rapture itself, the belief over at Fox seems to be that if your fight-or-flight reflexes aren't activated, you aren't alive. This of course raises the question: why terrorize your own audience? Because it is the fastest way to bypasses the rational brain. In other words, when people are afraid, they don't think rationally. And when they can't think rationally, they'll believe anything.

Character Assassination/Ad Hominem. Fox does not like to waste time debating the idea. Instead, they prefer a quicker route to dispensing with their opponents: go after the person's credibility, motives, intelligence, character, or, if necessary, sanity. No category of character assassination is off the table and no offense is beneath them. Fox and like-minded media figures also use ad hominem attacks not just against individuals, but entire categories of people in an effort to discredit the ideas of every person who is seen to fall into that category, e.g. "liberals," "hippies," "progressives" etc. This form of argument - if it can be called that - leaves no room for genuine debate over ideas, so by definition, it is undemocratic. Not to mention just plain crass.

Rewriting History. This is another way of saying that propagandists make the facts fit their worldview. The Downing Street Memos on the Iraq war were a classic example of this on a massive scale, but it happens daily and over smaller issues as well. A recent case in point is Palin's mangling of the Paul Revere ride, which Fox reporters have bent over backward to validate. Why lie about the historical facts, even when they can be demonstrated to be false? Well, because dogmatic minds actually find it easier to reject reality than to update their viewpoints. They will literally rewrite history if it serves their interests. And they'll often speak with such authority that the casual viewer will be tempted to question what they knew as fact.

Claramente el republikkkanete no se da cuenta... imaginense que no se dan cuenta como el escadalo en Gran Bretaña tiene alguna relacion con Faux News y como este canal de propaganda tiene relacion con las proximas elecciones jajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja.. que se van a dar cuenta de las tacticas sucias de este canal...

Oiga y el pseudo republikkkanete de Parguito? Bien gracias...

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='napoleon888' timestamp='1311106659' post='2934248']
Cuidau que no les caiga la espuma que botan por la boca las turbas republikkkanas...jajajajajajajajaajaja. Aqui le tengo una lista parcial de lo que pierde la claque de aberrados una vez les tumben en mother ship que controla todos sus pensamientos tambien conocido como Faux News:

Panic Mongering. This goes one step beyond simple fear mongering. With panic mongering, there is never a break from the fear. The idea is to terrify and terrorize the audience during every waking moment. From Muslims to swine flu to recession to homosexuals to immigrants to the rapture itself, the belief over at Fox seems to be that if your fight-or-flight reflexes aren't activated, you aren't alive. This of course raises the question: why terrorize your own audience? Because it is the fastest way to bypasses the rational brain. In other words, when people are afraid, they don't think rationally. And when they can't think rationally, they'll believe anything.

Character Assassination/Ad Hominem. Fox does not like to waste time debating the idea. Instead, they prefer a quicker route to dispensing with their opponents: go after the person's credibility, motives, intelligence, character, or, if necessary, sanity. No category of character assassination is off the table and no offense is beneath them. Fox and like-minded media figures also use ad hominem attacks not just against individuals, but entire categories of people in an effort to discredit the ideas of every person who is seen to fall into that category, e.g. "liberals," "hippies," "progressives" etc. This form of argument - if it can be called that - leaves no room for genuine debate over ideas, so by definition, it is undemocratic. Not to mention just plain crass.

Rewriting History. This is another way of saying that propagandists make the facts fit their worldview. The Downing Street Memos on the Iraq war were a classic example of this on a massive scale, but it happens daily and over smaller issues as well. A recent case in point is Palin's mangling of the Paul Revere ride, which Fox reporters have bent over backward to validate. Why lie about the historical facts, even when they can be demonstrated to be false? Well, because dogmatic minds actually find it easier to reject reality than to update their viewpoints. They will literally rewrite history if it serves their interests. And they'll often speak with such authority that the casual viewer will be tempted to question what they knew as fact.

Claramente el republikkkanete no se da cuenta... imaginense que no se dan cuenta como el escadalo en Gran Bretaña tiene alguna relacion con Faux News y como este canal de propaganda tiene relacion con las proximas elecciones jajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja.. que se van a dar cuenta de las tacticas sucias de este canal...

Oiga y el pseudo republikkkanete de Parguito? Bien gracias...

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
[/quote]


Oye Nap@....1ro. No volviste a traer nada que invlucre a USA!!..2do.Cuando pongas algo pon el Link o fuente de donde salio eso!!!....Te pareces a alguien que yo conozco por ahi que hace las mismas trampitas!!!

Dito nene , no pegas una!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Administracion!!!! Saquenme al Troll!!!

No entiende el tema pero insiste en ser una repetidora!!!!!!

Pal aeropuerto negrita que hace falta quien carge maletas!!


WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='napoleon888' timestamp='1311107173' post='2934253']
Administracion!!!! Saquenme al Troll!!!

No entiende el tema pero insiste en ser una repetidora!!!!!!

Pal aeropuerto negrita que hace falta quien carge maletas!!


WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
[/quote]


jajajajaajajajajajajajajajaja!!!!....Se te fue el calzonsillo ajuste cuando te pido el [color="#FF0000"]LINK???[/color]....Hasta aca llega la peste de la churretaaaa!!!!....si , pide que te ayuden , ya yo he visto esa negativa de poner Links en otra parte!!! :hysterical:

Ditooo nene no pegas una , y mira que te ayudan!!!!



jajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Murdoch en estos momentos tiene problemas en otros paises, pero no se puede obviar que el viejo es dueno de Fox News, y quizas aun no ha cometido ningun crimen en USA pero si lo hizo en Londres quien quita que lo ha hecho en USA.....de seguro que Fox ha cometido alguna inregularidad....y tarde o temprano se sabra.


Es como si el dueno de ABC, CBS , NBC o cualquier otra estacion de Television comete una inregularidad en China pues de la misma forma crea dudas en USA.....claro muchos no quieren que les toquen sus templos y menos una emisora que se dedica a meter embustes. Too Bad!! :eatdrink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w39FnpuMRfo&feature=player_embedded#at=135[/YouTube]

Outfoxed examines how media empires,[color="#FF0000"] led by Rupert Murdoch's Fox News[/color], have been running a "race to the bottom" in television news. This film provides an in-depth look at Fox News and the dangers of ever-enlarging corporations taking control of the public's right to know. Read on »

The FOX Attacks! Edition DVD also includes the wildly successful FOX Attacks viral video series which continues to expose FOX News.

A message from Producer/Director Robert Greenwald, some press on Outfoxed, and a few letters we've received.

Our special video birthday wishes to FNC on its 10th birthday.
Bill O'Reilly lied about Outfoxed on Tim Russert's show. Here's our video response.

Rupert Murdoch is interviewed about Outfoxed in Doonesbury!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='Chemo' timestamp='1311107486' post='2934256']
jajajajaajajajajajajajajajaja!!!!....Se te fue el calzonsillo ajuste cuando te pido el [color="#FF0000"]LINK???[/color]....Hasta aca llega la peste de la churretaaaa!!!!....si , pide que te ayuden , ya yo he visto esa negativa de poner Links en otra parte!!! :hysterical:

Ditooo nene no pegas una , y mira que te ayudan!!!!



jajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!
[/quote]


Pero que link te voy a poner pitiyanqui si fui yo el que lo "escribi". Me pregunto que informacion te dara el link o el autor mas cuando te la pasas dandole copy and paste a wikipedia como si fuera una fuente confiable.

Que brutt!! Que brutt!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='napoleon888' timestamp='1311111329' post='2934261']
Pero que link te voy a poner pitiyanqui si fui yo el que lo "escribi". Me pregunto que informacion te dara el link o el autor mas cuando te la pasas dandole copy and paste a wikipedia como si fuera una fuente confiable.

Que brutt!! Que brutt!!!
[/quote]


Pon el [color="#FF0000"]LINK[/color] y deja te de cuentos!!!...Pitipatriota si eso en ingles :hysterical: lo escribistes tu tiene menos menos credibilidad que un pasquin de el Monge Loco!!!....por que los socialistas tienen la mala costumbre de hablar sin pruebas , de ocultar la fuente de informacion y de crear tantas teorias de conspiracion???

Dito Nap@ no pegas una , por eso te tenemos dia y noche con los Bloomers en los tobillos!!

jajajajajajajaja

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='napoleon888' timestamp='1311111329' post='2934261']
Pero que link te voy a poner pitiyanqui si fui yo el que lo "escribi". Me pregunto que informacion te dara el link o el autor mas cuando te la pasas dandole copy and paste a wikipedia como si fuera una fuente confiable.

Que brutt!! Que brutt!!!
[/quote]


Oye Nap@ realmente me ha impresionado tu dominio de el ingles ya que segun tu, tu escribistes todo eso :clap: ....Wow Nap@ por que no me cuentas como fue que te inspiraste y de donde sacaste la musa para escribir todo esto de manera tan elaborada y perfecta!!!...Vamos Negr@ no te hagas de rogar , no me digas que tu arte Rimbaustico fue el detonante que te inspiro en el idioma de Shakespeare para que te saliera esa fastuosa ,elaborada y genial analisis izquierdista en el idioma "dificil" como tu le llamas!!!!.....Vamos maestro , comparta con nosotros sus logros en el dominio de los idiomas y en las artes de hablar mierda sin sentido!!! :yahoo:

Dale bambalan , que tu publico te aclama!!!

jajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote .pname='mimapr' timestamp='1311110612' post='2934260']
[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w39FnpuMRfo&feature=player_embedded#at=135[/YouTube]

Outfoxed examines how media empires,[color="#FF0000"] led by Rupert Murdoch's Fox News[/color], have been running a "race to the bottom" in television news. This film provides an in-depth look at Fox News and the dangers of ever-enlarging corporations taking control of the public's right to know. Read on »

The FOX Attacks! Edition DVD also includes the wildly successful FOX Attacks viral video series which continues to expose FOX News.

A message from Producer/Director Robert Greenwald, some press on Outfoxed, and a few letters we've received.

Our special video birthday wishes to FNC on its 10th birthday.
Bill O'Reilly lied about Outfoxed on Tim Russert's show. Here's our video response.

Rupert Murdoch is interviewed about Outfoxed in Doonesbury!
[/quote]



I find it amusing that disgruntled former employees are slamming the Fox editors in N Y. Any of them an 80 year old tycoon?

So far, you've got nothing but liberal sour grapes... And a little unfulfilled fantasy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='napoleon888' timestamp='1311111329' post='2934261']
Pero que link te voy a poner pitiyanqui si fui yo el que lo "escribi". Me pregunto que informacion te dara el link o el autor mas cuando te la pasas dandole copy and paste a wikipedia como si fuera una fuente confiable.

Que brutt!! Que brutt!!!
[/quote]


I certainly have to join Chemo In his amazement at your sudden command of prose, philosophy and leftist demagoguery worthy of a sharp mind in touch with its more tender personality traits and not a unified ""super"....

So... When did you write this bit that seems so well beyond your displayed ability?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='mimapr' timestamp='1311109655' post='2934259']
Murdoch en estos momentos tiene problemas en otros paises, pero no se puede obviar que el viejo es dueno de Fox News, y quizas aun no ha cometido ningun crimen en USA pero si lo hizo en Londres quien quita que lo ha hecho en USA.....de seguro que Fox ha cometido alguna inregularidad....y tarde o temprano se sabra.


Es como si el dueno de ABC, CBS , NBC o cualquier otra estacion de Television comete una inregularidad en China pues de la misma forma crea dudas en USA.....claro muchos no quieren que les toquen sus templos y menos una emisora que se dedica a meter embustes. Too Bad!! :eatdrink:
[/quote]


And who should do time for this bribe...

[color="#FF0000"]Editado[/color] Edited by mimapr
nada que ver con el tema

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Mira que bofeta mas linda le han dado a un 'Napoleon-like' que le tiro un pastelazo a Murdoch cuando estaba deponiendo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3SfSBjo7YE

Y la galleta se la dio una mujer, la esposa de Murdoch. Bien hecho, ustedes liberales tienen que aprender a seguir el proceso judicial y dejar que el acusado se defienda. Ahora la gente le tiene mas simpatía a Murdoch aunque no se la merezca.


El enajenado le grito "Naughty billionaire" cuando tiro el pastel, así que el problema para el imberbe socialista es el dinero de Murdoch y no lo que algunos en sus periódicos hicieron. Ese es el [i]Class Warfare[/i] que aprenden alla los subditos britanicos de su Labor Party y los subditos liberales aca del Partido Democrata.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[color="#FF0000"]EDITADO[/color]

MANTENTE EN EL TEMA, ESTO ES SOBRE MURDOCH , SI QUIERES HABLAR DE OBAMA ABRE UN TEMA NUEVO O POSTEA EN UNO DE LOS ARTAGUITOS, QUE TIENE SOBRE 100 TEMAS SOBRE OBAMA.

Pues yo pensaba que era sobre la corrupcion y sobornos como el de Murdoch y traje un ejemplo en el que un miembro de la claque interna de OB, ya que el puesto de "zar de empleos es atipico y no ha sido aprobado por el congreso, cuyo conglomerado multi-industrial posee una de las tres redes televisivas del Pais recibio mas de un beneficio de la actual administracion y que regularmente se pronuncian en las noticias en favor o en contra sin revelar ser objeto de tales dispendios de generosidad fiscal. Claro que aqui las reglas son mascomo un peine que como una navaja...

Pero vayamos a lo medular y que probablemente te saque agruras... Aun cuando fuese esa la "politica implicita" de el fenecido periodico britanico, Murdoch y su empresa tienen lo que en la CIA y la politica se llama "plausible deniability" y por lo cual es improbable que algun dia se vean cargos criminales en los EEUU...

Aqui te anejo una opinion de dos legos que encontraras tan irritante como interesante...
U.S. Could Prosecute Murdoch

[u]We've seen many mentions these last few days of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.S. law under which some suggest Rupert Murdoch could be prosecuted[/u]. But is it really plausible that Murdoch and/or his News Corp. could be prosecuted in the United States for alleged bribes paid to British police officers by British employees of its British sister company? Yes, it is. So says the act, and so say two legal experts I spoke with Tuesday who have extensive experience in working with the law.

The FCPA became law in 1977 at a time, says New York attorney Roland Riopelle of Sercarz & Riopelle, of “rampant corporate corruption overseas[b].” It was designed to create a domestic remedy for misbehavior by U.S. corporations abroad. A typical FCPA prosecution might involve something like going after an official of a U.S.-based company for paying a bribe to an official in a foreign country to win a government contract.[/b] There are both civil and criminal jurisdictions to such prosecutions. [u]The Securities & Exchange Commission often has jurisdiction over such prosecutions, in conjunction with the Department of Justice. Almost all such prosecutions are brought by the DOJ itself[/u]—and not, say, a local U.S. Attorney's Office like the mighty Southern District of New York—because the cases “are felt to have international financial implications,” Riopelle says.

Riopelle, a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District, says [b]there is no doubt that bribes allegedly paid to British police officers would expose News Corp. to prosecution in America under the FCPA. He does think, however, that it would be somewhat abnormal. “Paying a police officer to get information about a pending investigation isn't the typical FCPA prosecution,” [/b]he says. More typically, the United States brings a prosecution—for example, against an employee bribing a developing-world contracting official—because the host country lacks the will or resources to punish the official or the company.

But John Davis, a partner at the Washington firm of Miller & Chevalier who has spent the bulk of the past 15 years working on FCPA cases, says [u]he wouldn't lift an eyebrow if the SEC, for example, were to bring [b]a civil prosecution (civil cases, remember, have a lower burden of proof[/b]). [/u]The SEC, he says, has every right under the statute to make a determination that what News International did in Britain constituted enough of a violation of U.S. standards and practices that the company deserves to be prosecuted civilly in the U.S. while defending itself against criminal charges in the U.K. “If you asked me today—and asked peers and colleagues of mine—if that would be a surprise, the answer is no,” Davis says.

[b]So a prosecution, even without a finding of any wrongdoing on American soil, is both legal and plausible. Of course, both men say very few FCPA prosecutions really go to court. The vast majority are settled[/b]. Probably the most conspicuous FCPA case of recent years involved the German electronics company Siemens, which kept a slush fund totaling well over $1 billion to win overseas contracts. In that case, the host country, [b]Germany, came down hard on Siemens with large fines, but the United States still made the company pay $800 million to the U.S. treasury. That was a settlement in which Siemens did not admit wrongdoing[/b].

The SEC and the DOJ could jointly pursue something like that with the Murdochs. How much money the SEC would seek would be the key question, Davis says. He notes further that the government has other tools at its disposal—that in some cases, it has required an independent monitor to oversee the company. Imagine an Eric Holder-appointed supervisor looking over Roger Ailes' shoulder?!

[b]These possibilities bring us to the issue of the lawyer, and the firm, Murdoch has hired. Brendan Sullivan, and Williams & Connolly, do not have a reputation in the legal world, says Riopelle, for playing nice or settling. “It's not a firm known for schmoozing the process,” he says. “You hire them because it's going to be a pitched battle.”[/b]

Riopelle makes one other interesting point. When he was in the Southern District, his boss Otto Obermaier had a big case against Salomon Brothers and its then-boss, John Gutfreund. Obermaier chose to prosecute Gutfreund personally but not Salomon because Obermaier was concerned that naming one of America's largest financial-services firms could have vast economic repercussions. But a news outfit, even a really large one? “It's not as if that prosecution is going to roil the financial markets in the way a huge corporate prosecution would,” he says.

So there's no global economic risk inherent in the government going after News Corp. And the law would certainly appear to support it. The [b]only risk, of course, is political. Would Barack Obama and Holder would be willing to take the inevitable heat for an arguably unusual application of the law?[/b] I think [u]we know enough about Obama at this point to conclude that this is something he'd never do, [/u]unless new information inflamed U.S. public opinion (if, say, we learned that the News of the World hacked Americans' phones), and maybe not even then. But U.S. law is clear, and if any of Murdoch's British properties did bribe UK police, they broke American law, too.



Asi que el mejor (para los democratas y demas pseudo-socialistas) de todos los posibles es un caso en el foro civil y no en el criminal con un potencial alto costo para la administracion que pareceria estar aplicando una ley de censura. Edited by charlie319
NADA QUE VER CON EL TEMA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
[quote name='Artaguito' timestamp='1311144564' post='2934279']
Mira que bofeta mas linda le han dado a un 'Napoleon-like' que le tiro un pastelazo a Murdoch cuando estaba deponiendo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3SfSBjo7YE

Y la galleta se la dio una mujer, la esposa de Murdoch. Bien hecho, ustedes liberales tienen que aprender a seguir el proceso judicial y dejar que el acusado se defienda. Ahora la gente le tiene mas simpatía a Murdoch aunque no se la merezca.


El enajenado le grito "Naughty billionaire" cuando tiro el pastel, así que el problema para el imberbe socialista es el dinero de Murdoch y no lo que algunos en sus periódicos hicieron. Ese es el [i]Class Warfare[/i] que aprenden alla los subditos britanicos de su Labor Party y los subditos liberales aca del Partido Democrata.
[/quote]


Saben porque el Parguito lo unico que comenta es sobre el intento del pastelazo a su Goebbels?

Jajajajaja porque mientras los verdaderos canales de noticias estaban cubriendo el grilling que le hicieron al propagandista republikkkano, Fox News entiendase el one stop shopping de un republikkkano enajenado de la realidad como el Parguito, se limito a cubrir el incidente jajajajajajajajajajaja cosa que su audiencia no tuviera acceso a lo que en realidad era importante. Me imagino que el parguito sabe mas del pie que el resto de nosotros que vimos como la momia propagandista fue asado en su propia salsa.

Ahora diganme republikkkanos y pitiyanquis si entienden el porque lo que esta pasando en Gran Bretaña les afecta en su nacion, que creen que pasara con los Parguitos de la vida una vez los desconecten del Mother Ship Nazi-Propagandistico de Faux News? Si este cabestro no acepta punto de vista alternos por lo fanatico y bocabajo que es.....la derrota se acerca... todavia no se dan cuenta??



At Fox News, a Scandal Hits Home

[color="#FF0000"]The pie attack may have been the best thing that happened to Fox News on Tuesday.[/color]

All the cable news networks covered the parliamentary hearing live on Tuesday. So did Fox News, though its producers didn’t have much of a choice — the scandal that has engulfed the channel’s parent company, the News Corporation, is too big to ignore. Or examine too closely.

Moments after the pie incident, the pool camera in the committee room abruptly cut away. Fox turned the newscast over to Sky News, its sister network in Britain (also owned by Mr. Murdoch), and let British colleagues report on the commotion. (They showed lots of slow-motion replays of Mr. Murdoch’s wife, Wendi, smacking the intruder.) [color="#FF0000"]When other cable news programs moved on to critique what Mr. Murdoch and his son James had said, Fox News stayed with the pie until the hearing resumed[/color].

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/20/arts/television/at-fox-news-a-scandal-hits-home.html

Ven lo que les digo? Que predecibles son!!



WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0